 Computes the aoristic sum.

Usage

aoristic(x, y, ...)

# S4 method for numeric,numeric
aoristic(
x,
y,
step = 1,
start = min(x, na.rm = TRUE),
stop = max(y, na.rm = TRUE),
weight = TRUE,
groups = NULL
)

# S4 method for list,missing
aoristic(x, step = 1, start = NULL, stop = NULL, weight = TRUE, groups = NULL)

Arguments

x

A numeric vector. If y is missing, must be a list (or a data.frame) with numeric components (columns) from and to.

y

A numeric vector. If missing, an attempt is made to interpret x in a suitable way.

...

Currently not used.

step

A length-one integer vector giving the step size, i.e. the width of each time step in the time series (in years CE; defaults to $$1$$ - i.e. annual level).

start

A length-one numeric vector giving the beginning of the time window (in years CE).

stop

A length-one numeric vector giving the end of the time window (in years CE).

weight

A logical scalar: should the aoristic sum be weighted by the length of periods (default). If FALSE the aoristic sum is the number of elements within a time block.

groups

A factor vector in the sense that as.factor(groups) defines the grouping. If x is a list (or a data.frame), groups can be a length-one vector giving the index of the grouping component (column) of x.

Value

An AoristicSum object.

Details

Aoristic analysis is used to determine the probability of contemporaneity of archaeological sites or assemblages. The aoristic analysis distributes the probability of an event uniformly over each temporal fraction of the period considered. The aoristic sum is then the distribution of the total number of events to be assumed within this period.

Muller and Hinz (2018) pointed out that the overlapping of temporal intervals related to period categorization and dating accuracy is likely to bias the analysis. They proposed a weighting method to overcome this problem. This method is not implemented here (for the moment), see the aoristAAR package.

Crema, E. R. (2012). Modelling Temporal Uncertainty in Archaeological Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19(3): 440-61. doi: 10.1007/s10816-011-9122-3 .

Johnson, I. (2004). Aoristic Analysis: Seeds of a New Approach to Mapping Archaeological Distributions through Time. In Ausserer, K. F., Börner, W., Goriany, M. & Karlhuber-Vöckl, L. (ed.), Enter the Past - The E-Way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage, Oxford: Archaeopress, p. 448-52. BAR International Series 1227. doi: 10.15496/publikation-2085

Müller-Scheeßel, N. & Hinz, M. (2018). Aoristic Research in R: Correcting Temporal Categorizations in Archaeology. Presented at the Human History and Digital Future (CAA 2018), Tubingen, March 21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUBukex30QI.

Palmisano, A., Bevan, A. & Shennan, S. (2017). Comparing Archaeological Proxies for Long-Term Population Patterns: An Example from Central Italy. Journal of Archaeological Science, 87: 59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.10.001 .

Ratcliffe, J. H. (2000). Aoristic Analysis: The Spatial Interpretation of Unspecific Temporal Events. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(7): 669-79. doi: 10.1080/136588100424963 .

Ratcliffe, J. H. (2002). Aoristic Signatures and the Spatio-Temporal Analysis of High Volume Crime Patterns. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(1): 23-43. doi: 10.1023/A:1013240828824 .